11/23/2023 0 Comments Second front controversy wwii![]() Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems General: Article is new enough and long enough Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of ClancartyĬreated by Hawkeye7 ( talk).Eisenhower (pictured) generated more polemics than the broad front versus narrow front controversy in World War II? Source: "Of all decisions made at the level of the Supreme Allied Commander in western Europe during World War II, perhaps none has excited more polemics than that which raised the 'one-thrust-broad front' controversy". ![]() that perhaps no decision of General Dwight D. Hog Farm Talk 03:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Reply It made sense to me, although I do have some familiarity with this general topic from reviewing the logistics in the northern France campaign article. Hog Farm Talk 18:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Reply Did you find the article interesting? Does it make sense to you? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Reply I did find it interesting. Images all appear to be appropriately licensed.Error of some sort in Weigley, looks like a typo of / instead of |.Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Reply Somehow, the Taylor and Van Creveld refs seem to have been jammed togetherĬorrected."Pogue felt that the description of "pencil-like" was more applicable to Patton's proposal, which called for just two corps, and which Eisenhower likewise rejected" - Was Patton's proposal the "whereby the main effort of the 12th Army Group would be south of the Ardennes, towards Metz and the Saar" mentioned above?."This is no reason to doubt his assessment." - It's unclear to me what "this" is referring toĭeleted sentence."Brooke and Churchill, were visiting the Italian front at the time." - Is that comma truly necessary?.What's off is that the H in SHAEF already stands for "headquarters" so "advanced SHAEF headquarters" is a tautology. "SHAEF advanced at Jullouville was ill-suited to the conduct of a fast-moving land battle" - Something is also off a little there."knowledge that a second army group was operation in France" - Something's a little off in the phrasing.Hog Farm Talk 00:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Reply Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Reply I check the warfare list at WP:GAN a couple times a week, thought this one looks interesting, and decided to take the review. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. This review is transcluded from Talk:Broad front versus narrow front controversy in World War II/GA1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |